Do you perform penetration testing?

We coordinate independent penetration testing and provide hands-on remediation of every finding, not just a report.

Do you review smart contracts and blockchain infrastructure for security?

Yes, including custody flows, wallet infrastructure, and on-chain contract logic.

Is this a substitute for legal or licensing advice?

No. We build the technical controls regulators and partners expect; jurisdiction-specific licensing and legal questions should go through qualified counsel.

How often should we re-run a security assessment?

At minimum with every material architectural change, and on a regular recurring cadence (typically quarterly to annually depending on your risk profile) even without a specific trigger.

Can you set up ongoing sanctions re-screening, not just onboarding checks?

Yes, we build continuous re-screening against updated sanctions and PEP lists so risk that emerges after onboarding doesn't go unnoticed.

Do you help write and test an incident response plan?

Yes, including running tabletop exercises with your team so the plan is validated under simulated pressure before it's ever needed for real.

Secure enterprise server room with holographic digital security shield representing cybersecurity and compliance engineering

Security & Compliance

Cybersecurity, AML/KYC & Compliance Engineering

Q: Can you build AML/KYC into our existing platform?

Yes, we integrate identity verification, sanctions screening, and transaction monitoring workflows into existing platforms via API.

Regulated industries can't treat security as an afterthought. Hurain Technologies provides secure architecture review, API and application security engineering, and AML/KYC compliance software development for fintech, payments, and blockchain platforms handling sensitive transaction data.

Get a Technical Estimate

Overview

What cybersecurity, aml/kyc & compliance engineering actually involves

Security debt behaves like financial debt: small and manageable early on, compounding quietly while a platform is small, and suddenly very expensive the moment real transaction volume, a banking partner's due diligence team, or a regulator starts paying close attention. The platforms we see get into the most trouble aren't the ones that never thought about security — they're the ones that treated it as a checklist to complete once, rather than a standing discipline that has to keep pace as the system, its data volume, and its attacker interest all grow.

AML/KYC compliance sits right next to security in this discussion because the two are more related than they first appear: both are ultimately about knowing who's interacting with your system and being able to prove, after the fact, exactly what happened and why. We build audit logging, access controls, and identity workflows as one coherent trust layer, not as separate systems that happen to sit next to each other.

The Challenge

Problems we see teams struggling with

Unreviewed architecture before scale-up

Security debt compounds quickly once a platform is handling real transaction volume and regulator scrutiny.

API and application vulnerabilities

Unsecured APIs are one of the most common entry points for breaches in fintech and payments platforms.

Manual AML/KYC processes

Manual identity verification and sanctions screening slow onboarding and create compliance gaps.

Audit and licensing readiness gaps

Missing logging, access controls, or reporting capability can block a licensing application or banking partnership.

No incident response plan tested before it's needed

The first real test of an incident response plan shouldn't be an actual breach — untested plans routinely fail at the exact moment they matter most.

Sanctions screening gaps at onboarding

Screening that runs once at account opening but never again misses risk that emerges after a customer relationship is already established.

Our Approach

How Hurain Technologies solves it

Secure architecture review

Threat modeling and architecture review across infrastructure, application, and data layers before you scale.

API security engineering

OAuth2/OIDC hardening, rate limiting, input validation, and abuse protection for public and partner APIs.

AML/KYC compliance software

Identity verification, sanctions/PEP screening, and transaction monitoring workflows built into your platform.

Penetration testing & remediation

Independent penetration testing coordination with hands-on remediation of findings.

Smart contract & blockchain security

Security review for on-chain systems, custody flows, and wallet infrastructure.

Audit-ready logging & reporting

Immutable audit trails and regulator-ready reporting exports built into the platform, not bolted on.

Ongoing sanctions and PEP re-screening

Continuous re-screening against updated sanctions and politically-exposed-person lists, not just a one-time check at onboarding.

Incident response planning and testing

A documented, rehearsed incident response plan so the first time your team executes it isn't during an actual breach.

Technology

Tech stack we work with

Security Testing

OWASP methodologyPenetration testing toolingStatic/dynamic analysis (SAST/DAST)

Identity & Compliance

KYC/AML provider integrationSanctions/PEP screeningTravel Rule messaging

Infra Security

IAM hardeningNetwork segmentationSecrets management (Vault/KMS)

Monitoring

SIEM integrationAudit loggingReal-time alerting

A secure architecture review starts with threat modeling, not a scanner: we map out who can interact with the system, what each interaction path allows, and what happens if a given component is compromised, across infrastructure, application, and data layers. Automated tooling (SAST/DAST) catches known vulnerability classes efficiently, but the findings that actually prevent a breach — a trust boundary that shouldn't exist, an authorization check missing on one endpoint out of two hundred — usually come from that manual threat-modeling pass.

AML/KYC workflows are built around a jurisdiction-aware rules engine rather than hard-coded logic, because requirements genuinely differ by market — different KYC tiers, different transaction thresholds, different reporting obligations. That configurability is what lets a compliance program adapt as regulations evolve or as you expand into new markets, instead of requiring an engineering project every time a rule changes.

Use Cases

Where cybersecurity, aml/kyc & compliance engineering gets used

Pre-banking-partnership security review

A gap assessment and remediation sprint to pass a banking partner's or payment network's security due diligence before onboarding.

Pre-licensing compliance readiness

Building the audit logging, access controls, and reporting infrastructure a regulator's licensing review will expect to see.

Ongoing penetration testing program

Scheduled, recurring penetration testing and remediation rather than a one-time pre-launch check.

KYC/AML integration for a new platform

Wiring identity verification, sanctions screening, and transaction monitoring into a platform's onboarding and transaction flows.

Smart contract and custody security review

Independent security review of on-chain systems and custody architecture for blockchain platforms specifically.

Incident response readiness

Developing and rehearsing an incident response plan so your team has a tested playbook before it's ever actually needed.

Proof

Results we've delivered

Client Result

A fintech preparing for a banking partnership audit needed to close security gaps within eight weeks. Hurain Technologies ran a full architecture and API security review, remediated 34 findings, and implemented audit-ready logging — the client passed their banking partner's security review on the first submission.

Process

How an engagement runs

1
Security & compliance assessment
Architecture, API, and process review against your regulatory and partner requirements.
2
Risk-ranked remediation plan
Findings prioritized by severity and business impact, with a clear remediation roadmap.
3
Implementation
Hands-on remediation of security gaps and build-out of AML/KYC workflows.
4
Independent testing
Penetration testing and validation before go-live or audit submission.
5
Ongoing monitoring
SIEM integration and continuous monitoring to maintain your security posture.

Engagement Models

How we structure the work

Security and compliance assessment

A focused gap assessment against your specific banking partner, regulator, or audit requirements, producing a risk-ranked remediation plan.

Remediation sprint

Hands-on implementation of the fixes identified in an assessment, typically scoped to a fixed deadline like an upcoming audit.

Ongoing security retainer

Continuous monitoring, periodic penetration testing, and security review of new features as your platform evolves.

Compliance program build-out

A dedicated engagement to build KYC/AML workflows, sanctions screening, and reporting infrastructure from the ground up.

Pitfalls

Mistakes we see teams make

Treating a single audit as a permanent state

Passing a security review once doesn't mean the system stays secure as new features ship — security has to be revisited with every material architectural change.

Screening for sanctions only at onboarding

A customer can become sanctioned or politically exposed after their account is already open; ongoing re-screening catches what a one-time check misses.

Logging enough to notice a problem but not enough to investigate it

Audit logs that record that something happened without enough context to reconstruct why are far less useful during an actual incident or regulator inquiry.

Writing an incident response plan that's never been rehearsed

A plan nobody has walked through in a tabletop exercise reliably falls apart under the actual pressure and confusion of a real incident.

Glossary

Key terms explained

Threat model: A structured analysis of who could attack a system, what they could gain, and which components would be affected, used to prioritize security work.
SAST / DAST: Static and Dynamic Application Security Testing — automated tools that scan source code (SAST) or a running application (DAST) for known vulnerability patterns.
PEP (Politically Exposed Person): An individual holding a prominent public position, subject to enhanced due diligence under AML regulations due to elevated corruption risk.
SIEM: Security Information and Event Management — a system that aggregates and analyzes security logs across an organization to detect and alert on suspicious activity.
Zero trust: A security model that assumes no user or system should be implicitly trusted, requiring verification for every access request regardless of network location.

FAQ