Can you support a DNB-registered crypto-asset service provider?

Yes, we build the AML/CTF transaction monitoring and reporting controls typically expected in a DNB registration review.

How much can AI fraud detection reduce our losses?

Results vary by baseline, but clients typically see 40-65% reduction in fraud losses alongside a meaningful drop in false positives.

Do you replace our existing rules engine or work alongside it?

We typically build a hybrid model — machine learning risk scoring layered on top of your existing rules — so you keep proven controls while adding adaptive detection.

Can this integrate with our existing payment platform?

Yes, our risk engines integrate via API or event stream into existing payment, banking, or fintech platforms.

How do you handle model explainability for compliance?

Every flagged decision includes contributing factors and a confidence score, logged for audit and regulator review.

AI & Automation · Netherlands

AI Fraud Detection & Intelligent Automation in Netherlands

Fraud losses and manual review queues both eat margin. Hurain Technologies builds AI-driven fraud detection, transaction monitoring, and workflow automation systems for payments and fintech platforms — real-time risk scoring, anomaly detection, and automated case management that reduce loss without adding friction for good customers. In Netherlands, that means building to the technical expectations of High-Value Regulated Markets: Payment institutions and fintechs are commonly supervised by DNB and/or the AFM depending on activity type.

Get a Netherlands Estimate View Netherlands Overview

Netherlands Regulatory Landscape

What ai fraud detection & automation buyers in Netherlands need to know

Payment institutions and fintechs are commonly supervised by DNB and/or the AFM depending on activity type.
Open banking integrations reference PSD2-derived standards for account access and payment initiation.
Crypto-asset service providers registered in the Netherlands are supervised by DNB for AML/CTF compliance.
We build the platform-level technical controls these bodies expect, alongside your Dutch legal and compliance advisors.

This information is provided for general orientation only and is not legal or licensing advice. Always confirm current requirements with qualified local counsel.

The Challenge

Problems we see teams struggling with

Fraud losses outpacing rule-based systems

Static rule engines can't keep up with evolving fraud patterns, leading to rising chargeback and loss rates.

Manual review bottlenecks

Investigation teams drown in false positives, slowing down legitimate customers and burning analyst hours.

No real-time visibility into risk

Batch-based monitoring catches fraud after the money has already moved.

Repetitive manual operations

Reconciliation, reporting, and case triage consume hours that could be automated.

Model drift going undetected

Fraud patterns evolve, and a model that isn't monitored and retrained regularly quietly loses accuracy until losses spike and someone finally investigates why.

No feedback loop from investigator decisions

When analyst outcomes aren't fed back into the model, the system never learns from the cases your own team has already correctly resolved.

Our Approach

How we deliver ai fraud detection & automation in Netherlands

Real-time transaction monitoring

Stream-processing risk engines that score transactions in milliseconds, not batch cycles.

Machine learning risk scoring

Supervised and unsupervised models trained on your transaction patterns, continuously retrained as fraud tactics evolve.

Anomaly & behavioral detection

Device fingerprinting, velocity checks, and behavioral biometrics layered on top of traditional rules.

Automated case management

Risk-ranked case queues that route only genuine high-risk cases to human analysts.

AML/KYC workflow automation

Automated sanctions screening, PEP checks, and suspicious activity report generation.

Operational workflow automation

RPA and orchestration for reconciliation, reporting, and other repetitive back-office processes.

Continuous model monitoring and retraining

Automated drift detection and a scheduled retraining pipeline that feeds investigator decisions back into the model, so it improves rather than silently decaying.

Technology